To reduce quiet quitting at workplace, provide clear performance expectations, encourage autonomy, have fewer meetings, communicate, connect, and engage your workforce.
Quiet quitting is not new. It’s just gotten more press in the past few years. More than a decade ago, I recommended that a leader invest in the development of his team to improve engagement and collaboration to achieve better results.
“But what if I develop them and they leave?” he asked.
“What if you don’t develop them and they stay?” I replied. Which of course I said in my most supportive coaching voice. (I used my “inside-the-head” voice for the eye roll.)
Below, you’re going to read a number of statistics, causes, and ideas to reduce quiet quitting. All of it is good information, and all of it is stuff you already know. So, if we already know all this, why does quiet quitting continue to stay on our Top 10 list of people concerns? Really, I’m asking. Why?
If I had to guess, I’d say that we often look for tactical solutions but forget how to engage the “people” at the center of those concerns. We talk about employees, managers, and leaders, but all of them are people. What would it mean for each of us, every day, to engage with every individual we encounter as a person? This may sound fluffy, but it’s not. What does each person need to be their best and to do their best work?
Let’s flip the question on its head for a moment. Instead of a person, let’s talk about a car. (Humor me.) What does a car need to operate at its best and to do its best work? The car needs gas, oil, and regular maintenance. Unless it’s an electric car, then it has other needs (just like different people do). Let’s assume our car is gas-powered. It’s a great car with a great engine and great potential. Which is all great. But what if I decide I don’t have time to fill the car with gas or change the brake pads, and I don’t understand why I need to change the oil, so I don’t? I’ve also ignored the “Check Engine” light burning brightly on my dashboard for months. Who cares? It’s just light, right? But eventually, my lack of attention and investment in my car are going to cause problems. However, my car is not going to quit quietly. Instead, I run out of gas, my battery dies, my brakes fail, and my engine seizes. All of which leave me stranded on the side of the road in the middle of the desert with only vultures for company.
It’s much easier to pay attention when quitting is loud and obvious, rather than quiet. What does a person need to be their best and to do their best work? There’s no manual for how people operate, but we have some good ideas, many of which you’ll find below. So, let’s review what we already know.
Did you know that only one in three workers is fully engaged at work today? Quiet quitters still make up half of the workforce, as they have for several years.
A pair of Gallup reports, released in 2022 and 2024, summarize the situation:
In its 2022 report, Gallup found that 32% of employees were “actively engaged” at work, while 18% were “actively disengaged,” (so-called “loud quitters”), and 50% were simply “not engaged” (the “quiet quitters”).
In the most recent report, released in January 2024, the results were very similar, with 33% of employees “actively engaged,” 16% “actively disengaged,” and at least 50% “not engaged.”
What is Quiet Quitting?
“Quiet quitting” refers to making the minimum effort to stay employed. Broadly speaking, “quiet quitters” are employees who aren’t engaged at work, but aren’t actively looking for a new job.
As a post-pandemic phenomenon rooted in lack of engagement, quiet quitting arose in tandem with the Great Resignation. It increased sharply in the second half of 2021, according to Gallup. It remains a challenge today, but organizations can take simple, practical steps to reduce it.
Causes of quiet quitting
Quiet quitting can be broadly traced to the effects of the pandemic. Here are some contributing factors:
The Great Resignation was a major contributor to quiet quitting, according to a study reported in Forbes. The Great Resignation placed extra burdens on most of the employees who stayed. It caused organizations to restructure, breaking up teams and putting people in unfamiliar environments. Not surprisingly, engagement suffered and quiet quitting rose.
Another pandemic-related disruption has been the rise of remote and hybrid work. Many organizations have yet to adapt. According to Gallup, most managers reported having no formal training to lead a hybrid team.
Without adequate management, the “new normal” of hybrid work has led to lower levels of engagement and more quiet quitting.
Unclear workplace expectations
Many employees simply don’t know what they should be working on. They report a lack of guidance on priorities, deadlines, and organizational goals. Remote and hybrid workers are twice as likely as in-house workers to say they don’t receive enough guidance. Unclear expectations have been another cause of quiet quitting, according to both Gallup and Forbes.
Lack of personal connection
According to Gallup, employees are less likely than before the pandemic to say that “someone cares about them as a person” at work. This lack of personal connection to the workplace leads to quiet quitting.
Taking steps to reduce quiet quitting
The good news is that, although “quiet quitters” are not engaged, they are not beyond reach.
Here are a few simple steps organizations can take to motivate quiet quitters to be more engaged at work.
Have one conversation per week
This surprisingly simple suggestion comes from the 2024 Gallup report. It is cited as the single most important step leaders can take to combat quiet quitting. Spending 15 to 30 minutes per week speaking with each team member has several benefits:
- Making sure employees know what is expected of them, including clear priorities, deadlines, and organizational goals.
- Checking in with employees who may be struggling or showing signs of becoming disengaged.
- Making personal connections to reduce the feeling that “no one cares.”
Avoid unnecessary meetings
This should be a no-brainer, but reporting in Forbes shows otherwise. Too many organizations are scheduling ever more meetings to cope with post-pandemic changes. The results have been predictably negative.
Employees feel micromanaged. They report lower productivity, with some losing one-quarter to one-half of the workday to meetings. And despite the time spent, employees feel no more informed about workplace expectations.
The simple solution is to schedule fewer meetings, with fewer participants. Avoid “all hands” meetings unless absolutely necessary. Have conversations instead!
Encouraging autonomy and showing flexibility is another way to reduce quiet quitting, according to Psychology Today. Increased autonomy promotes feelings of being trusted and valued, rather than being micromanaged.
Once the organization has made its expectations clear, let individuals decide how they will achieve their goals, as much as possible. Be flexible in accommodating different working styles so each individual can realize his or her full potential.
The above steps are simple on paper, but harder to implement, especially if we approach fixing our culture and engagement like we would a car, rather than interacting with people. We need to invest time and attention in our people to understand what will help them to be at their best to do their best work. Quiet quitting is our Check Engine light. It’s a good indication that something’s not working, and the light has been flashing on our dashboard for decades. So, what are we going to do about it?
If you would like more information about employee engagement and quiet quitting, please contact us.
Rachel Burr is an executive and leadership coach with over 20 years of experience working with CEOs and the C-suite across all industries, in organizations of from 20 to 10,000 employees. Rachel holds dual master’s degrees in Organization Development and Clinical Psychology, and numerous certifications in the field of executive coaching. Rachel is a “people expert” who works with clients to unleash their leadership potential.